On this page
Credit-quality allocation and fund ratings add useful context to a fund research record, but they describe different things. A portfolio bucket is a reported share of assets. A security rating applies to a named rated subject. A fund rating has its own scope and methodology.
ILovePSX exposes these facts through allocation rows, holdings fields and ratings rows. This guide explains how to keep them separate when building a dashboard or retrieving context for an AI assistant. It does not convert those facts into a personal risk assessment or a guarantee.
The useful part, upfront.
- Credit-quality buckets are allocations; fund ratings are separate rows.
- Preserve the exact rating label, agency, date and subject.
- An unavailable rating is not a zero score or a low rating.
Separate the bucket, the security and the fund#
MUFAP’s template treats credit-quality allocation separately from holdings and fund-rating information. Preserve those separate sections in your application rather than assigning all of their values to a generic credit score.
PACRA describes a fund stability rating as an assessment of a portfolio, with credit, liquidity and interest-rate risk in scope. Its debt-instrument ratings instead address particular instruments, while asset-manager ratings assess the manager under another methodology. The subject and rating product matter as much as the displayed label.
Your interface should therefore have separate components: reported quality buckets, ratings attached to individual holdings where available, and the report’s ratings table. A label shown in one component should not silently be copied into another. Consult the issuing agency’s definitions before interpreting a scale.
References: MUFAP standardized Fund Manager Report template · PACRA rating products and definitions
Retrieve credit-quality allocations with their real response shape#
GET /v1/mutual-funds/funds/{fund_slug}/credit-quality/latest defaults to allocation_type=CREDIT_QUALITY. Its success envelope contains data.allocations, not a dedicated credit_quality array. The data object also contains fund, report_date and section. Keeping this shape straight prevents an empty panel caused by reading a nonexistent property.
In a complete FMR, credit-quality rows belong to the allocations expansion. Request include=all or explicitly include allocations, then filter allocation_type. The default complete-report response does not include allocation rows. A missing unrequested property is not evidence of a portfolio without rated assets.
const key = process.env.ILOVEPSX_API_KEY;
const slug = process.env.FUND_SLUG;
if (!key || !slug) throw new Error("Set the API key and fund slug");
const response = await fetch(
`https://funds.api.ilovepsx.com/v1/mutual-funds/funds/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/credit-quality/latest`,
{ headers: { "X-API-Key": key }, signal: AbortSignal.timeout(15000) },
);
if (!response.ok) throw new Error(`Quality request failed: ${response.status}`);
const { data } = await response.json();
const qualityRows = data.allocations.filter(
(row) => row.allocation_type === "CREDIT_QUALITY",
);
const model = { reportDate: data.report_date, qualityRows };References: ILovePSX public API reference
Preserve bucket labels and percentage denominators#
A quality row uses the allocation model: allocation_type, label_raw, optional label_normalized, percentage-basis fields and other reported measurements. Keep the original bucket label, even when you introduce a normalized display grouping. An agency rating label and a descriptive allocation category are not necessarily the same vocabulary.
Do not turn a bucket label into a numerical risk score just to make it sortable. A reported descriptive category should remain descriptive unless a documented method establishes a transformation. Keep any such analysis in your own derived layer, with the original rows still visible.
Choose percent_of_total_assets, percent_of_net_assets or another supplied measurement by a stated rule. Preserve nulls and avoid automatically forcing displayed buckets to total 100%. If the measurements cannot be reconciled on one basis, show the available facts and the unresolved issue instead of drawing a definitive pie chart.
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Read rating type, agency and date as one record#
The report ratings rows retain rating_type, rating_raw, rating_agency, rating_date and outlook_raw. Do not display the label alone. Include the rated subject where the source establishes it and retain enough context to distinguish an AMC-related assessment from a fund-related one.
Holdings can separately contain credit_rating and rating_agency. Those values belong to the reported holding record and should remain attached to it. Do not promote an individual holding’s rating into a fund rating or assign a portfolio’s rating to each security.
PACRA’s published methodology distinguishes the risk assessment of fund assets from the assessment of an individual security. Its product descriptions also distinguish historical performance ranking from fund stability. A higher-looking label across different products does not establish an ordered comparison; use the relevant agency scale and definition.
| Fact | Context to retain |
|---|---|
| Quality allocation | Bucket, percentage denominator, report date |
| Holding credit rating | Reported position and rating agency |
| Report rating | rating_type, label, agency, rating_date, outlook |
| Unresolved subject or scale | An explicit unknown; no synthetic score |
References: ILovePSX public API reference · PACRA rating products and definitions · PACRA Fund Stability Rating methodology
A worked credit-quality distribution#
This separate fictional case, Example Credit Research Fund, demonstrates quality buckets for a hypothetical report dated 30 September 2026. It is independent of Example Research Fund’s allocation and holdings examples. The labels below are invented demonstration inputs, not agency-issued ratings or a verified mapping to any agency scale.
The four synthetic weights share a total-assets denominator and sum to 100%. They therefore support a complete illustration of this particular table. That arithmetic does not create a fund stability rating, establish investment suitability or turn the invented AAA bucket into a claim about actual securities. A real interface must retain source labels, agency context where supplied and section availability.
| allocation_type | label_raw | percent_of_total_assets |
|---|---|---|
| CREDIT_QUALITY | AAA — synthetic bucket | 35.000000 |
| CREDIT_QUALITY | AA — synthetic bucket | 25.000000 |
| CREDIT_QUALITY | A — synthetic bucket | 15.000000 |
| CREDIT_QUALITY | Unrated — synthetic bucket | 25.000000 |
Handle missing quality and rating information precisely#
An empty filtered quality array means no structured CREDIT_QUALITY rows were returned for that period. The focused endpoint’s section metadata currently counts the allocation section before the type filter, so AVAILABLE can coexist with an empty quality array if other allocation rows exist. Inspect the filtered rows to determine the quality panel’s state.
NOT_REPORTED likewise describes an empty section in production data. It does not establish that an issuer omitted a required disclosure. An unknown rating_date, an unavailable rating and a reported unrated bucket are separate states and should not be collapsed into one red warning or one zero value.
Use language that matches the evidence: ‘Rating date unavailable in this row,’ ‘No structured quality buckets available for this report,’ or the exact reported category. A tool that makes those distinctions gives users useful context while avoiding unsupported conclusions about the fund’s quality.
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Compare quality snapshots only after aligning context#
The credit-quality/history endpoint accepts from and to report-date bounds. Start a comparison by choosing a reporting period and verifying the bucket labels and percentage bases. A changed raw label can require source review before it is treated as the same category in a trend chart.
For rating rows, keep rating_date separate from report_date. A report can repeat an assessment made earlier; the report’s month alone does not establish when the rating was assigned. If the source supplies no newer rating information, do not infer a reaffirmation just because a later FMR exists.
A change in reported quality-bucket weight does not identify its cause. Show the change in the reported distribution without claiming an upgrade, downgrade or transaction unless separate evidence establishes that event. Keep missing periods visible rather than interpolating a complete series from sparse snapshots.
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Build a source-aware quality panel for research and AI#
Present quality allocation as a labelled table or chart with a text equivalent, followed by a separate ratings table. Add the reporting date, original labels and source links. If a display abbreviation is necessary, expose the complete source text so an analyst can verify the interpretation.
For AI retrieval, send the rated subject, rating type, agency, date and available definition with the label. Require the assistant to state which facts are missing. A bare rating token in a prompt cannot communicate whether it describes a security, a fund or an AMC.
Connect the panel to the full profile, reported performance and holdings views. Those sections create a richer research workflow, while each remains a separately defined fact set. PACRA states that its fund opinion is not a purchase, sale or holding recommendation; your application should likewise avoid presenting a rating as a personalized decision.
References: ILovePSX public API reference · PACRA rating products and definitions
Try a complete example.
Use these fictional records to prototype a full fund view: profile, reported returns, holdings, asset and sector allocations, credit quality, fees and ratings. Every name, identifier and number is invented. This is educational mock data, with no connection to a real fund, source document or agency opinion.
The JSON mirrors the public response structure. The complete FMR example includes all supported expansions; empty arrays and nulls demonstrate valid missing-data states. Your live integration must still request the sections it needs and check the returned coverage.
Inspect the complete FMR model
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"report_ids": [
"00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101"
],
"fund": {
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000201",
"slug": "example-research-fund",
"name": "Example Research Fund",
"mufap_fund_id": null,
"amc": {
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000301",
"slug": "example-asset-management",
"name": "Example Asset Management"
}
},
"report_date": "2026-09-30",
"currency": "PKR",
"data_version": 1,
"identity": {
"fund_name_as_reported": "Example Research Fund",
"fund_short_name_as_reported": "ERF",
"parent_fund_name_as_reported": null,
"plan_name_as_reported": null,
"fund_type_as_reported": "Open-end",
"category_as_reported": "Illustrative mixed-asset category",
"risk_profile_as_reported": "Illustrative higher-risk profile",
"is_shariah_compliant": false,
"is_plan": false,
"is_pension_scheme": false,
"is_etf": false
},
"fund_size": {
"nav_per_unit": "100.500000",
"nav_date": "2026-09-30",
"offer_price": "100.500000",
"redemption_price": "100.500000",
"repurchase_price": "100.500000",
"market_price": null,
"net_assets_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_including_fof_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_excluding_fof_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"amount_invested_by_fof_pkr": "0.0000",
"units_outstanding": "10000000.000000"
},
"profile": {
"launch_date": "2025-01-01",
"inception_date": "2025-01-01",
"maturity_date": null,
"benchmark": "Example composite benchmark",
"old_benchmark": null,
"new_benchmark": null,
"benchmark_effective_date": null,
"risk_of_principal_erosion": "Principal may fluctuate; synthetic disclosure.",
"pricing_mechanism": "Forward pricing — illustrative",
"dealing_days": "Monday to Friday — illustrative",
"dealing_time": "09:00 to 14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"cutoff_time": "14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"settlement_period": "T+2 — illustrative, not an actual dealing policy",
"minimum_initial_investment_pkr": "5000.0000",
"minimum_subsequent_investment_pkr": "1000.0000",
"minimum_redemption_pkr": "1000.0000",
"unit_classes": [
"Illustrative standard units"
],
"leverage": "None in this synthetic example"
},
"report_fragments": [
{
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"schema_version": "fmr_page_v3",
"data_version": 1,
"promoted_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"report_date": "2026-09-30",
"report_month": "September 2026",
"page_type": "FUND_REPORT",
"extraction_mode": "PROFILE_PERFORMANCE_PORTFOLIO",
"amc_name_raw": "Example Asset Management",
"fund_name_raw": "Example Research Fund",
"fund_short_name_raw": "ERF",
"parent_fund_name_raw": null,
"plan_name_raw": null,
"fund_type_raw": "Open-end",
"category_raw": "Illustrative mixed-asset category",
"risk_profile_raw": "Illustrative higher-risk profile",
"risk_of_principal_erosion_raw": "Principal may fluctuate; synthetic disclosure.",
"is_shariah_compliant": false,
"is_plan": false,
"is_pension_scheme": false,
"is_etf": false,
"launch_date": "2025-01-01",
"inception_date": "2025-01-01",
"maturity_date": null,
"benchmark_raw": "Example composite benchmark",
"old_benchmark_raw": null,
"new_benchmark_raw": null,
"benchmark_effective_date": null,
"par_value": "100.000000",
"listing_raw": null,
"leverage_raw": "None in this synthetic example",
"nav_per_unit": "100.500000",
"nav_date": "2026-09-30",
"offer_price": "100.500000",
"redemption_price": "100.500000",
"repurchase_price": "100.500000",
"market_price": null,
"net_assets": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_including_fof": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_excluding_fof": "1005000000.0000",
"amount_invested_by_fof": "0.0000",
"units_outstanding": "10000000.000000",
"currency": "PKR",
"pricing_mechanism_raw": "Forward pricing — illustrative",
"dealing_days_raw": "Monday to Friday — illustrative",
"dealing_time_raw": "09:00 to 14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"cutoff_time_raw": "14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"settlement_period_raw": "T+2 — illustrative, not an actual dealing policy",
"minimum_initial_investment": "5000.0000",
"minimum_subsequent_investment": "1000.0000",
"minimum_redemption": "1000.0000",
"unit_classes": [
"Illustrative standard units"
]
}
],
"sub_funds": [],
"reported_returns": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"period_label_raw": "1 year",
"period_key": "1Y",
"fund_return_percent": "12.00000000",
"benchmark_return_percent": "10.00000000",
"peer_return_percent": null,
"return_type": "ABSOLUTE",
"is_annualized": false,
"is_since_inception": false,
"calculation_basis_raw": "Synthetic cumulative return for the stated period"
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 2,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"period_label_raw": "Month to date",
"period_key": "MTD",
"fund_return_percent": "0.50000000",
"benchmark_return_percent": "0.40000000",
"peer_return_percent": null,
"return_type": "ABSOLUTE",
"is_annualized": false,
"is_since_inception": false,
"calculation_basis_raw": "Synthetic cumulative September return"
}
],
"allocations": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Equities",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "60.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "603000000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 2,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Cash",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "20.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "201000000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 3,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Government securities",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "15.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "150750000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 4,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Other assets",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "5.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "50250000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 5,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "SECTOR_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Technology",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "25.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "251250000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 6,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "SECTOR_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Fertilizer",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "20.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "201000000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 7,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "SECTOR_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Banks",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "15.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "150750000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 8,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "CREDIT_QUALITY",
"label_raw": "Government securities — illustrative bucket",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "15.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": null,
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 9,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "CREDIT_QUALITY",
"label_raw": "Unrated / no rating assigned in this example",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "85.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": null,
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
}
],
"holdings": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"holding_group": "TOP_HOLDINGS",
"rank": 1,
"name_raw": "Example Technology Company",
"holding_type": "EQUITY",
"asset_class": "Equities",
"issuer_name_raw": "Example Technology Company",
"security_name_raw": "Example Technology Company ordinary shares",
"symbol_raw": "EXTECH",
"sector_raw": "Technology",
"percent_of_total_assets": "18.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"percent_held": null,
"market_value": "180900000.0000",
"value_before_provisioning": null,
"provisioning_amount": null,
"value_after_provisioning": null,
"quantity": "1000000.000000",
"units": "shares",
"credit_rating": null,
"rating_agency": null,
"instrument_type_raw": "Ordinary shares",
"coupon_rate": null,
"yield_percent": null,
"ytm_percent": null,
"issue_date": null,
"maturity_date": null,
"listed_or_unlisted": "Listed — illustrative",
"secured_or_unsecured": null,
"is_shariah_compliant": null,
"is_top_holding": true,
"is_non_compliant": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 2,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"holding_group": "TOP_HOLDINGS",
"rank": 2,
"name_raw": "Example Fertilizer Company",
"holding_type": "EQUITY",
"asset_class": "Equities",
"issuer_name_raw": "Example Fertilizer Company",
"security_name_raw": "Example Fertilizer Company ordinary shares",
"symbol_raw": "EXFERT",
"sector_raw": "Fertilizer",
"percent_of_total_assets": "12.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"percent_held": null,
"market_value": "120600000.0000",
"value_before_provisioning": null,
"provisioning_amount": null,
"value_after_provisioning": null,
"quantity": "800000.000000",
"units": "shares",
"credit_rating": null,
"rating_agency": null,
"instrument_type_raw": "Ordinary shares",
"coupon_rate": null,
"yield_percent": null,
"ytm_percent": null,
"issue_date": null,
"maturity_date": null,
"listed_or_unlisted": "Listed — illustrative",
"secured_or_unsecured": null,
"is_shariah_compliant": null,
"is_top_holding": true,
"is_non_compliant": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 3,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"holding_group": "TOP_HOLDINGS",
"rank": 3,
"name_raw": "Example Banking Company",
"holding_type": "EQUITY",
"asset_class": "Equities",
"issuer_name_raw": "Example Banking Company",
"security_name_raw": "Example Banking Company ordinary shares",
"symbol_raw": "EXBANK",
"sector_raw": "Banks",
"percent_of_total_assets": "8.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"percent_held": null,
"market_value": "80400000.0000",
"value_before_provisioning": null,
"provisioning_amount": null,
"value_after_provisioning": null,
"quantity": "500000.000000",
"units": "shares",
"credit_rating": null,
"rating_agency": null,
"instrument_type_raw": "Ordinary shares",
"coupon_rate": null,
"yield_percent": null,
"ytm_percent": null,
"issue_date": null,
"maturity_date": null,
"listed_or_unlisted": "Listed — illustrative",
"secured_or_unsecured": null,
"is_shariah_compliant": null,
"is_top_holding": true,
"is_non_compliant": null
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"metric_key": "NUMBER_OF_HOLDINGS",
"label_raw": "Illustrative number of equity holdings",
"value": "12.00000000",
"unit": "count",
"period": "September 2026",
"benchmark_value": null
}
],
"fees": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"fee_type": "TOTAL_EXPENSE_RATIO",
"label_raw": "Illustrative annualized total expense ratio",
"value_percent": "2.000000",
"value_amount": null,
"currency": "PKR",
"period": "September 2026 — annualized illustration",
"with_government_levies": true,
"government_levy_percent": null,
"secp_fee_percent": null,
"is_actual_charged": true,
"is_maximum_allowed": false
}
],
"ratings": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"rating_type": "ILLUSTRATIVE",
"rating_raw": "Illustrative rating — not an agency opinion",
"rating_agency": "Example agency (fictional)",
"rating_date": null,
"outlook_raw": null
}
],
"parties": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"role": "FUND_MANAGER",
"name_raw": "Example Research Team",
"designation_raw": "Illustrative fund-management team",
"organization_raw": "Example Asset Management"
}
],
"special_terms": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"term_type": "INVESTMENT_OBJECTIVE",
"label_raw": "Illustrative investment objective",
"value_raw": "A fictional mixed-asset portfolio used only to demonstrate the response model.",
"value_numeric": null,
"value_percent": null,
"value_amount": null,
"value_date": null,
"currency": "PKR"
}
],
"compliance": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"compliance_type": "ILLUSTRATIVE_DISCLOSURE",
"name_raw": "Synthetic compliance disclosure",
"limit_type_raw": null,
"regulatory_limit_percent": null,
"actual_exposure_percent": null,
"excess_percent": null,
"gross_assets_percent": null,
"net_assets_percent": null,
"status_raw": "Illustrative only — no regulatory assessment has been performed"
}
],
"notes": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"note_kind": "NOTE",
"section_type": "PORTFOLIO",
"note_type": "ILLUSTRATIVE",
"text": "All figures and entities are synthetic. The three reported top holdings are a partial list. Sector percentages use total assets. Credit-quality labels and rating text are not agency opinions."
}
],
"source": [
{
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"document": null,
"promoted_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"data_version": 1
}
],
"sections": {
"sub_funds": {
"status": "NOT_REPORTED",
"row_count": 0
},
"reported_returns": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 2
},
"allocations": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 9
},
"holdings": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 3
},
"metrics": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"fees": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"ratings": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"parties": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"special_terms": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"compliance": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"notes": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"source": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
}
},
"available_expansions": [
"allocations",
"compliance",
"fees",
"holdings",
"metrics",
"notes",
"parties",
"ratings",
"reported_returns",
"source",
"special_terms",
"sub_funds"
]
},
"meta": {
"request_id": "00000000000040008000000000000401",
"generated_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"data_as_of": "2026-09-30",
"data_freshness_days": 8
}
}Inspect the latest NAV model
{
"success": true,
"data": [
{
"fund_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000201",
"fund_slug": "example-research-fund",
"fund_name": "Example Research Fund",
"mufap_fund_id": null,
"nav_date": "2026-09-30",
"nav": "100.500000",
"offer_price": "100.500000",
"repurchase_price": "100.500000",
"market_price": null,
"front_end_load_pct": "0.000000",
"back_end_load_pct": "0.000000",
"contingent_load_pct": null,
"nav_change_abs": null,
"nav_change_pct": null,
"currency": "PKR"
}
],
"meta": {
"request_id": "00000000000040008000000000000402",
"generated_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"data_as_of": "2026-09-30",
"data_freshness_days": 8
}
}Sources & further reading
Check the published contract for current fields and limits. Source documents describe reported facts; API availability still depends on promoted production coverage.
- ILovePSX public API reference
Published operations and parameters. Examples follow the repository contract reviewed on 8 October 2026.
- MUFAP standardized Fund Manager Report template
Consult the original document and the applicable AMC report for reporting definitions.
- Structured Fund Manager Reports API
- PACRA rating products and definitions
- PACRA Fund Stability Rating methodology
Put the guide to work.
Start with the documented contract, keep your key server-side, and make dates and missing data visible in your product.
Explore quality and rating operations