On this page
A useful mutual fund comparison begins with aligned facts: the same reporting period, a compatible return definition and correctly labelled portfolio percentages. Fetching each fund’s latest report independently can produce a polished table containing different months.
This guide builds a client-side research workflow from ILovePSX’s documented registry and FMR operations. Two fictional funds provide the worked example. The workflow is application logic, not an announcement of a public comparison endpoint or a recommendation of a winning fund.
The useful part, upfront.
- Find a shared available report_date before comparing monthly facts.
- Align return period, annualization and calculation basis before subtracting values.
- Compare holdings, allocations, credit quality and fees under their own compatible scopes.
Choose a coherent research cohort#
Use canonical fund discovery and the returned slugs to identify candidates. Registry classifications help define a cohort, but a shared category alone is insufficient. Plans, unit classes, pension sub-funds and benchmark changes can create differences that need explicit handling.
For this guide, Example Alpha Fund and Example Beta Fund are fictional funds assumed to share a comparable research scope. Their names, report dates and values are mock inputs. They do not represent real peer funds or imply that production has a complete shared period.
Write down the inclusion rule before fetching performance. For example, 'two selected funds, same report month, monthly absolute reported return, identical documented calculation basis.' This prevents a comparison from changing its definition merely because one desired field is unavailable.
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Align reported-return rows before calculating a difference#
Select matching period_label_raw and period_key values, then inspect return_type, is_annualized and calculation_basis_raw. A one-month annualized figure cannot be subtracted from a one-month absolute figure and presented as a meaningful performance gap.
The fictional aligned rows use an explicitly absolute monthly return, is_annualized=false and the same illustrative calculation basis. Alpha reports 1.20000000% and Beta 0.90000000%. Their descriptive difference is 0.30000000 percentage points, not 0.3 percent relative improvement.
The MUFAP template distinguishes reporting conventions across types of performance disclosure. Your software should read the row’s actual metadata and report footnotes rather than guessing a convention from a category label. If the basis is unavailable, make the comparison conditional or unresolved.
| Mock reported-return field | Alpha | Beta |
|---|---|---|
| report_date | 2026-08-31 | 2026-08-31 |
| period_label_raw | August 2026 | August 2026 |
| period_key | MTD | MTD |
| return_type | ABSOLUTE | ABSOLUTE |
| is_annualized | false | false |
| fund_return_percent | 1.20000000 | 0.90000000 |
| calculation_basis_raw | Illustrative reinvested NAV basis | Illustrative reinvested NAV basis |
References: ILovePSX public API reference · MUFAP standardized Fund Manager Report template
Use an explicit comparison guard#
This small Python example performs a comparison only after required context matches. It uses a projection of complete-report and return-row fields; it is not a full API response. The arithmetic stays in Decimal so the percentage-point result is exact.
A production implementation needs additional validation for canonical scope, currency, benchmark identity and report footnotes. Equality of a raw calculation label is a necessary check in this mock exercise, not proof that two unrelated methodologies are economically equivalent.
from decimal import Decimal
common = {
"report_date": "2026-08-31",
"period_key": "MTD",
"return_type": "ABSOLUTE",
"is_annualized": False,
"calculation_basis_raw": "Illustrative reinvested NAV basis",
}
alpha = {**common, "fund_return_percent": "1.20000000"}
beta = {**common, "fund_return_percent": "0.90000000"}
def difference_pp(left, right):
for field in common:
if left.get(field) is None or left.get(field) != right.get(field):
raise ValueError(f"Incompatible or missing {field}")
if left.get("fund_return_percent") is None or right.get("fund_return_percent") is None:
raise ValueError("Return unavailable")
return Decimal(left["fund_return_percent"]) - Decimal(right["fund_return_percent"])
assert difference_pp(alpha, beta) == Decimal("0.30000000")Add portfolio context without forcing a score#
A full-fund comparison can include asset allocation, sector allocation, top holdings and credit-quality tables. These sections explain different exposures. Their percentages should share the same reporting date and denominator within each comparison; percent_of_total_assets and percent_of_net_assets are not interchangeable.
In the fictional table, asset rows sum to 100% for each fund, but the top-three holdings represent only a disclosed subset. Do not call the subset a complete portfolio. Credit-quality buckets need their own reported labels and scope rather than a guessed conversion into a numeric safety score.
An empty expanded portfolio section means no available production rows in the selected response. It does not establish zero equity exposure or no holdings. Display unavailable facts plainly and keep them out of derived totals until the necessary evidence is available.
| Synthetic fact at 2026-08-31 | Alpha | Beta | Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed equities | 60% | 50% | % of total assets |
| Cash | 20% | 30% | % of total assets |
| Other assets | 20% | 20% | % of total assets |
| Displayed top-three holdings | 38% | 32% | Subset of total assets |
| Credit-quality bucket label | Example bucket A | Example bucket A | Fictional label; no agency opinion |
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Keep fees and benchmarks attached to their definitions#
Fee comparison needs the period, percentage base, levy treatment and whether the value is actual charged or maximum allowed. An annualized monthly TER observation and a YTD observation may both be percentages but describe different aggregation periods.
Benchmark comparison also needs identity and dates. A report can preserve old_benchmark, new_benchmark and benchmark_effective_date. A current benchmark label alone may not explain the older period you selected. Carry the applicable benchmark context rather than relabelling historical figures.
Do not turn one lower fee or one higher return into a universal ranking. The resulting page should describe the aligned observations and unresolved differences. Readers can then investigate the profile, portfolio and source evidence without being presented with an unsupported 'best fund' verdict.
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Publish a comparison someone can reproduce#
Show the selected date above the comparison and put units directly in column headings. Keep source links and page references near the relevant sections. A difference should be accompanied by its calculation name, including the phrase 'percentage points' when that is the measure.
Save an export manifest containing canonical identities, explicit report dates, returned versions, requested expansions and application methodology version. Revisions can change the data later; an analysis should remain tied to what was actually examined.
For AI retrieval, package each observation with its fund, period, basis and source context. Include the unavailable sections and comparison limits. This lets an assistant report the checked differences while preserving the uncertainty that a flattened two-number answer would discard.
References: ILovePSX public API reference
Try a complete example.
Use these fictional records to prototype a full fund view: profile, reported returns, holdings, asset and sector allocations, credit quality, fees and ratings. Every name, identifier and number is invented. This is educational mock data, with no connection to a real fund, source document or agency opinion.
The JSON mirrors the public response structure. The complete FMR example includes all supported expansions; empty arrays and nulls demonstrate valid missing-data states. Your live integration must still request the sections it needs and check the returned coverage.
Inspect the complete FMR model
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"report_ids": [
"00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101"
],
"fund": {
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000201",
"slug": "example-research-fund",
"name": "Example Research Fund",
"mufap_fund_id": null,
"amc": {
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000301",
"slug": "example-asset-management",
"name": "Example Asset Management"
}
},
"report_date": "2026-09-30",
"currency": "PKR",
"data_version": 1,
"identity": {
"fund_name_as_reported": "Example Research Fund",
"fund_short_name_as_reported": "ERF",
"parent_fund_name_as_reported": null,
"plan_name_as_reported": null,
"fund_type_as_reported": "Open-end",
"category_as_reported": "Illustrative mixed-asset category",
"risk_profile_as_reported": "Illustrative higher-risk profile",
"is_shariah_compliant": false,
"is_plan": false,
"is_pension_scheme": false,
"is_etf": false
},
"fund_size": {
"nav_per_unit": "100.500000",
"nav_date": "2026-09-30",
"offer_price": "100.500000",
"redemption_price": "100.500000",
"repurchase_price": "100.500000",
"market_price": null,
"net_assets_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_including_fof_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_excluding_fof_pkr": "1005000000.0000",
"amount_invested_by_fof_pkr": "0.0000",
"units_outstanding": "10000000.000000"
},
"profile": {
"launch_date": "2025-01-01",
"inception_date": "2025-01-01",
"maturity_date": null,
"benchmark": "Example composite benchmark",
"old_benchmark": null,
"new_benchmark": null,
"benchmark_effective_date": null,
"risk_of_principal_erosion": "Principal may fluctuate; synthetic disclosure.",
"pricing_mechanism": "Forward pricing — illustrative",
"dealing_days": "Monday to Friday — illustrative",
"dealing_time": "09:00 to 14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"cutoff_time": "14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"settlement_period": "T+2 — illustrative, not an actual dealing policy",
"minimum_initial_investment_pkr": "5000.0000",
"minimum_subsequent_investment_pkr": "1000.0000",
"minimum_redemption_pkr": "1000.0000",
"unit_classes": [
"Illustrative standard units"
],
"leverage": "None in this synthetic example"
},
"report_fragments": [
{
"id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"schema_version": "fmr_page_v3",
"data_version": 1,
"promoted_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"report_date": "2026-09-30",
"report_month": "September 2026",
"page_type": "FUND_REPORT",
"extraction_mode": "PROFILE_PERFORMANCE_PORTFOLIO",
"amc_name_raw": "Example Asset Management",
"fund_name_raw": "Example Research Fund",
"fund_short_name_raw": "ERF",
"parent_fund_name_raw": null,
"plan_name_raw": null,
"fund_type_raw": "Open-end",
"category_raw": "Illustrative mixed-asset category",
"risk_profile_raw": "Illustrative higher-risk profile",
"risk_of_principal_erosion_raw": "Principal may fluctuate; synthetic disclosure.",
"is_shariah_compliant": false,
"is_plan": false,
"is_pension_scheme": false,
"is_etf": false,
"launch_date": "2025-01-01",
"inception_date": "2025-01-01",
"maturity_date": null,
"benchmark_raw": "Example composite benchmark",
"old_benchmark_raw": null,
"new_benchmark_raw": null,
"benchmark_effective_date": null,
"par_value": "100.000000",
"listing_raw": null,
"leverage_raw": "None in this synthetic example",
"nav_per_unit": "100.500000",
"nav_date": "2026-09-30",
"offer_price": "100.500000",
"redemption_price": "100.500000",
"repurchase_price": "100.500000",
"market_price": null,
"net_assets": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_including_fof": "1005000000.0000",
"fund_size_excluding_fof": "1005000000.0000",
"amount_invested_by_fof": "0.0000",
"units_outstanding": "10000000.000000",
"currency": "PKR",
"pricing_mechanism_raw": "Forward pricing — illustrative",
"dealing_days_raw": "Monday to Friday — illustrative",
"dealing_time_raw": "09:00 to 14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"cutoff_time_raw": "14:00 Pakistan time — illustrative",
"settlement_period_raw": "T+2 — illustrative, not an actual dealing policy",
"minimum_initial_investment": "5000.0000",
"minimum_subsequent_investment": "1000.0000",
"minimum_redemption": "1000.0000",
"unit_classes": [
"Illustrative standard units"
]
}
],
"sub_funds": [],
"reported_returns": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"period_label_raw": "1 year",
"period_key": "1Y",
"fund_return_percent": "12.00000000",
"benchmark_return_percent": "10.00000000",
"peer_return_percent": null,
"return_type": "ABSOLUTE",
"is_annualized": false,
"is_since_inception": false,
"calculation_basis_raw": "Synthetic cumulative return for the stated period"
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 2,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"period_label_raw": "Month to date",
"period_key": "MTD",
"fund_return_percent": "0.50000000",
"benchmark_return_percent": "0.40000000",
"peer_return_percent": null,
"return_type": "ABSOLUTE",
"is_annualized": false,
"is_since_inception": false,
"calculation_basis_raw": "Synthetic cumulative September return"
}
],
"allocations": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Equities",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "60.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "603000000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 2,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Cash",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "20.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "201000000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 3,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Government securities",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "15.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "150750000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 4,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "ASSET_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Other assets",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "5.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "50250000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 5,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "SECTOR_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Technology",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "25.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "251250000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 6,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "SECTOR_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Fertilizer",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "20.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "201000000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 7,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "SECTOR_ALLOCATION",
"label_raw": "Banks",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "15.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": "150750000.0000",
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 8,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "CREDIT_QUALITY",
"label_raw": "Government securities — illustrative bucket",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "15.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": null,
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 9,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"allocation_type": "CREDIT_QUALITY",
"label_raw": "Unrated / no rating assigned in this example",
"label_normalized": null,
"percent_of_total_assets": "85.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"amount": null,
"current_period": null,
"previous_period": null,
"change_percent": null,
"bucket_start_days": null,
"bucket_end_days": null,
"bucket_start_years": null,
"bucket_end_years": null
}
],
"holdings": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"holding_group": "TOP_HOLDINGS",
"rank": 1,
"name_raw": "Example Technology Company",
"holding_type": "EQUITY",
"asset_class": "Equities",
"issuer_name_raw": "Example Technology Company",
"security_name_raw": "Example Technology Company ordinary shares",
"symbol_raw": "EXTECH",
"sector_raw": "Technology",
"percent_of_total_assets": "18.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"percent_held": null,
"market_value": "180900000.0000",
"value_before_provisioning": null,
"provisioning_amount": null,
"value_after_provisioning": null,
"quantity": "1000000.000000",
"units": "shares",
"credit_rating": null,
"rating_agency": null,
"instrument_type_raw": "Ordinary shares",
"coupon_rate": null,
"yield_percent": null,
"ytm_percent": null,
"issue_date": null,
"maturity_date": null,
"listed_or_unlisted": "Listed — illustrative",
"secured_or_unsecured": null,
"is_shariah_compliant": null,
"is_top_holding": true,
"is_non_compliant": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 2,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"holding_group": "TOP_HOLDINGS",
"rank": 2,
"name_raw": "Example Fertilizer Company",
"holding_type": "EQUITY",
"asset_class": "Equities",
"issuer_name_raw": "Example Fertilizer Company",
"security_name_raw": "Example Fertilizer Company ordinary shares",
"symbol_raw": "EXFERT",
"sector_raw": "Fertilizer",
"percent_of_total_assets": "12.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"percent_held": null,
"market_value": "120600000.0000",
"value_before_provisioning": null,
"provisioning_amount": null,
"value_after_provisioning": null,
"quantity": "800000.000000",
"units": "shares",
"credit_rating": null,
"rating_agency": null,
"instrument_type_raw": "Ordinary shares",
"coupon_rate": null,
"yield_percent": null,
"ytm_percent": null,
"issue_date": null,
"maturity_date": null,
"listed_or_unlisted": "Listed — illustrative",
"secured_or_unsecured": null,
"is_shariah_compliant": null,
"is_top_holding": true,
"is_non_compliant": null
},
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 3,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"holding_group": "TOP_HOLDINGS",
"rank": 3,
"name_raw": "Example Banking Company",
"holding_type": "EQUITY",
"asset_class": "Equities",
"issuer_name_raw": "Example Banking Company",
"security_name_raw": "Example Banking Company ordinary shares",
"symbol_raw": "EXBANK",
"sector_raw": "Banks",
"percent_of_total_assets": "8.000000",
"percent_of_net_assets": null,
"percent_of_gross_assets": null,
"percent_held": null,
"market_value": "80400000.0000",
"value_before_provisioning": null,
"provisioning_amount": null,
"value_after_provisioning": null,
"quantity": "500000.000000",
"units": "shares",
"credit_rating": null,
"rating_agency": null,
"instrument_type_raw": "Ordinary shares",
"coupon_rate": null,
"yield_percent": null,
"ytm_percent": null,
"issue_date": null,
"maturity_date": null,
"listed_or_unlisted": "Listed — illustrative",
"secured_or_unsecured": null,
"is_shariah_compliant": null,
"is_top_holding": true,
"is_non_compliant": null
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"metric_key": "NUMBER_OF_HOLDINGS",
"label_raw": "Illustrative number of equity holdings",
"value": "12.00000000",
"unit": "count",
"period": "September 2026",
"benchmark_value": null
}
],
"fees": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"fee_type": "TOTAL_EXPENSE_RATIO",
"label_raw": "Illustrative annualized total expense ratio",
"value_percent": "2.000000",
"value_amount": null,
"currency": "PKR",
"period": "September 2026 — annualized illustration",
"with_government_levies": true,
"government_levy_percent": null,
"secp_fee_percent": null,
"is_actual_charged": true,
"is_maximum_allowed": false
}
],
"ratings": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"rating_type": "ILLUSTRATIVE",
"rating_raw": "Illustrative rating — not an agency opinion",
"rating_agency": "Example agency (fictional)",
"rating_date": null,
"outlook_raw": null
}
],
"parties": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"role": "FUND_MANAGER",
"name_raw": "Example Research Team",
"designation_raw": "Illustrative fund-management team",
"organization_raw": "Example Asset Management"
}
],
"special_terms": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"term_type": "INVESTMENT_OBJECTIVE",
"label_raw": "Illustrative investment objective",
"value_raw": "A fictional mixed-asset portfolio used only to demonstrate the response model.",
"value_numeric": null,
"value_percent": null,
"value_amount": null,
"value_date": null,
"currency": "PKR"
}
],
"compliance": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"compliance_type": "ILLUSTRATIVE_DISCLOSURE",
"name_raw": "Synthetic compliance disclosure",
"limit_type_raw": null,
"regulatory_limit_percent": null,
"actual_exposure_percent": null,
"excess_percent": null,
"gross_assets_percent": null,
"net_assets_percent": null,
"status_raw": "Illustrative only — no regulatory assessment has been performed"
}
],
"notes": [
{
"sub_fund_key": null,
"sub_fund_name_raw": null,
"row_order": 1,
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"note_kind": "NOTE",
"section_type": "PORTFOLIO",
"note_type": "ILLUSTRATIVE",
"text": "All figures and entities are synthetic. The three reported top holdings are a partial list. Sector percentages use total assets. Credit-quality labels and rating text are not agency opinions."
}
],
"source": [
{
"report_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000101",
"page_number": 1,
"document": null,
"promoted_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"data_version": 1
}
],
"sections": {
"sub_funds": {
"status": "NOT_REPORTED",
"row_count": 0
},
"reported_returns": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 2
},
"allocations": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 9
},
"holdings": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 3
},
"metrics": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"fees": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"ratings": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"parties": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"special_terms": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"compliance": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"notes": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
},
"source": {
"status": "AVAILABLE",
"row_count": 1
}
},
"available_expansions": [
"allocations",
"compliance",
"fees",
"holdings",
"metrics",
"notes",
"parties",
"ratings",
"reported_returns",
"source",
"special_terms",
"sub_funds"
]
},
"meta": {
"request_id": "00000000000040008000000000000401",
"generated_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"data_as_of": "2026-09-30",
"data_freshness_days": 8
}
}Inspect the latest NAV model
{
"success": true,
"data": [
{
"fund_id": "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000201",
"fund_slug": "example-research-fund",
"fund_name": "Example Research Fund",
"mufap_fund_id": null,
"nav_date": "2026-09-30",
"nav": "100.500000",
"offer_price": "100.500000",
"repurchase_price": "100.500000",
"market_price": null,
"front_end_load_pct": "0.000000",
"back_end_load_pct": "0.000000",
"contingent_load_pct": null,
"nav_change_abs": null,
"nav_change_pct": null,
"currency": "PKR"
}
],
"meta": {
"request_id": "00000000000040008000000000000402",
"generated_at": "2026-10-08T08:00:00Z",
"data_as_of": "2026-09-30",
"data_freshness_days": 8
}
}Sources & further reading
Check the published contract for current fields and limits. Source documents describe reported facts; API availability still depends on promoted production coverage.
- ILovePSX public API reference
Field mappings and operations checked against the local public contract on 8 October 2026.
- MUFAP standardized Fund Manager Report template
Read the applicable report and offering document for the actual basis and footnotes.
Put the guide to work.
Start with the documented contract, keep your key server-side, and make dates and missing data visible in your product.
Compare available report facts with their periods